Home > Message Board > Computers > Processors > AMD vs. Intel
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days
Author Thread: AMD vs. Intel
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Shortysetnies

Rock Vegas, NC
US

Post Number: 700
Registered: Mar-06
Edit Post

I am trying to decide between the AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 3800+ or the Intel Pentium 4 Processor 524 with HT Technology. What is the difference in these two and which would you suggest in a home computer mainly used for internet, video and music listening and downloading? Thanks guys.
Relevant Product Info
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Bernymac

Cambodian

Post Number: 1359
Registered: Sep-04
Edit Post

not really a fair comparison. get a intel core 2 duo. Intel cpus outperformed amd's cpu's by a very large margin. I wouldn't get a p4 because amd's non dual cores kicked intels p4 azz's. So if your going to go with a dual core setup get an intel.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: James_the_god

Doncaster, South Yorkshire
England

Post Number: 345
Registered: Jan-05
Edit Post

Have to agree with Berny on this one and Im quite a AMD fan. The core 2 duo is a good future proof product and perfect for your needs. AMD is primarily a gaming processor although at other tasks this doesnt mean they're rubbish. Pretty damn good.
If you have the patience for if its not too late, on my word its next year that you want to be upgrading your pc. Thats when everything changes!! Got a preview already with the new 8800 nvidia, amd quad core and intel quad core, ddr3 but i think thats pointless, amds new idea of the 'sinergy chip' if i remember rightly and intel with a trick or two up their sleeve.
I got my computer last July, a 3500+(when x2 was just released). Today even its a superb performer.

Simply, wait till there's advances and then enjoy the bargains mate!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Gamerdude

Ontario
Canada

Post Number: 382
Registered: Apr-06
Edit Post

Nah man the AM2 socket X2's are crazy fast and great for gaming and whatnot
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Shaun3291

Post Number: 1
Registered: Apr-07
Edit Post

i have to agree with ktle here, AMDs are great for gaming, i should know i have one, but also i find it is great for multi tasking and runs multiple programs with ease. I would definately recommend the Athlon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Stefanom

Vienna, VA
United States

Post Number: 467
Registered: Apr-06
Edit Post

AMD makes a fine processor (I use an old Athlon XP, I should know too), but it is currently outperformed by the Core 2 in pretty much every aspect. When the Barcelona core comes out, things might even out, but if you are looking for a pure performance CPU, the Core 2 is hard to beat. Now, if you're looking for good bang for the buck, AMD is still a strong competitor in many price brackets.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Gamerdude

Ontario
Canada

Post Number: 477
Registered: Apr-06
Edit Post

AMD's single core CPU's kill intels , Mac is releasing a 8core core due? whatever its called

www.apple.com
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Stefanom

Vienna, VA
United States

Post Number: 472
Registered: Apr-06
Edit Post

Dual quad core processors. Not sure what would take advantage of that kind of processing power, but who am I to question these things.

As far as single cores, its kind of a moot point these days, as the focus is on dual, quad, and beyond. In either case, the Core 2 architecture is superior to what AMD is fielding currently.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Shane24

Post Number: 122
Registered: Mar-07
Edit Post

the amd would defintely kick the hell out of intel's pentium 4, but its incorrect to compare them as amd athlon is dual-core processor.. however if u were comparing it against inteldualcore extreme.. then intel wins big a long shot.....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Platinum Member
Username: Project6

Post Number: 14514
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

Shane,
You still around?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Platinum Member
Username: Glasswolf

Wisteria, Lane
USA

Post Number: 12139
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

the x2 3800+ is a good CPU
I have an s939 version in my second box here. great little PC.

I will say though, that I just built an intel core2quad Q6600 rid @ 3.2GHz, and it absolutely slaughters the AMD. Decimates it.

Granted, not a fair comparison between an X2 that's 3 years old, and a brand new current gen Intel.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: 3dges

Compton

Post Number: 50
Registered: Feb-08
Edit Post

AMD is the way to go !
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image
Username: Need to Register?
Password: Forgot Password?
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out |
Home > Message Board > Computers > Processors > AMD vs. Intel [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]