Home > Message Board > Accessories > Cables > Archive through January 12, 2004 > Coax vs S video on Sat receiver
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Coax vs S video on Sat receiver
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
Posted on Sunday, May 18, 2003 - 02:11 am:    Edit Post
I heard that if you have a satellite receiver that there is more resolution than the standard coax cable can handle. They say you should use a s video cable.

Is a cheap (4 dollar) S video cable better than a high end coax cable?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 10:29 pm:    Edit Post
I use an S-Video and it greatly improved my systems picture - use S-Video.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
Posted on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 - 08:14 pm:    Edit Post
SATELLITE HAS ABOUT 500 LINES OF RESOULTION
A STANDARD COAX WILL PRODUCE ABOUT 280 MAXIUM
S VIDEO WILL PRODUCE 400-420 COMPOSITE ABOUT 380
COMPONENT ABOUT 480-500 THE MORE LINES THE CLEARER THE PITCHURE GET AT LEAST A GOLD PLATED CONNECTOR IT WILL NOT OXADIZE AND LOSE SIGNAL TRANSFER
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Accessories > Cables > Archive through January 12, 2004 > Coax vs S video on Sat receiver [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]