| Author |
Thread: Audiofiles-Acceptable Rear Fill |
    
Silver Member Username: Mikechec9
Chicago/atlanta
Post Number: 705
Registered: May-05
|
| Posted on Sunday, August 14, 2005 - 12:46 am: |
|
I don't run rear drivers at all. but if i did, it would be like this (copy and paste the link):
http://www.carsound.com/UBB/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=001818
wondering what audiofiles thought. |
|
|
|
Gold Member Username: Jonathan_f
GA
USA
Post Number: 4418
Registered: May-04
|
| Posted on Sunday, August 14, 2005 - 12:58 am: |
|
What, just simply with the rear fill wired out of phase on one channel? |
Gold Member Username: Glasswolf
Wisteria,
Lane
USA
Post Number: 9185
Registered: Dec-03
|
| Posted on Sunday, August 14, 2005 - 10:24 am: |
|
personally, if I used rear fill, I'd run them in mono, with a narrow bandpass filter.
that keeps the frequency range limited and prevents ruin of the front stage imaging.
|
Silver Member Username: Mikechec9
Chicago/atlanta
Post Number: 716
Registered: May-05
|
| Posted on Sunday, August 14, 2005 - 12:26 pm: |
|
i've never tried it. but it seems like if you did it and used midbass drivers with the narrow 2way filter like glass suggests, the result would be a delayed effect that succeeds the front image without upper frequencies.
kind of giving a true fill maintaining the forward imaging. does that sound about right?
|
Gold Member Username: Glasswolf
Wisteria,
Lane
USA
Post Number: 9191
Registered: Dec-03
|
| Posted on Sunday, August 14, 2005 - 02:36 pm: |
|
no delay.. but otherwise yeah you just get more midrange from the back to fill in.. without the highs to draw the soundstage back into the cabin of the car
|
|
