| Author |
Thread: Kicker KX 600.1 or Rockford P6001 |
    
|
| Posted on Friday, April 22, 2005 - 07:10 pm: |
|
Which amp would everyone reccomend Kicker KX 600.1 and Rockford Fosgate P6001? The Rockford says it's class bd, what does that mean and is it worse than class D? |
|
|
|
Gold Member Username: Taylor17
Kopperl,
Texas
Post Number: 1490
Registered: Jan-05
|
| Posted on Friday, April 22, 2005 - 07:36 pm: |
|
Rockford, Don't like Kicker. They come off as mass produced... everyone has one, and cheap. |
Gold Member Username: Subfanatic
Walton,
Ky
Post Number: 2705
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Friday, April 22, 2005 - 07:39 pm: |
|
i would take kicker, better build quality |
Anonymousse Unregistered guest |
| Posted on Saturday, April 23, 2005 - 12:01 am: |
|
I was under the impression that RF was mass produced also.. |
Gold Member Username: Jonathan_f
GA
USA
Post Number: 3751
Registered: May-04
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 23, 2005 - 12:33 am: |
|
Rockford Fosgate produces a ton more amps than Kicker. Both are mass produced, but RF more so. Just go to a Best Buy. Kickers are better made and better designed IMO. |
Silver Member Username: Importrapist
Savannah,
GA
U.S.A
Post Number: 173
Registered: Mar-05
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 23, 2005 - 12:47 am: |
|
I have to agree with Taylor17 I got your back!!! LOL |
Gold Member Username: Taylor17
Kopperl,
Texas
Post Number: 1495
Registered: Jan-05
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 23, 2005 - 03:14 pm: |
|
Jonathan, yes are both mass produced. But both are great amp's, it is just a matter of apinion I guess. You like Kicker more, and I like RF more. I will say that both make reliable amp's. There is nothing rong with either one!
It's just around where I live, everyone has a Kicker amp, and I believe I'm one of the few who has a RF amp... maybe because RF is a little expencive. |
|
