| Author |
Thread: MTX or Fosgate |
    
|
| Posted on Monday, April 18, 2005 - 10:45 pm: |
|
if you had to choose wich of the two would be better.
|
|
|
|
Silver Member Username: Byrumjr
Post Number: 199
Registered: Jan-05
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - 12:37 am: |
|
I would take the MTX over Fosgate. First Fosgate amps are more money for less real watts than MTX amps. Next Fosgate amps run hotter than MTX amps. The Fosgate amps might be built a little better and they look a lot better than the new MTX amps. |
Silver Member Username: Importrapist
Savannah,
GA
U.S.A
Post Number: 160
Registered: Mar-05
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - 07:19 am: |
|
All i know is, i see alot more RF amps in competition cars than MTX........ |
Gold Member Username: Taylor17
Kopperl,
Texas
Post Number: 1428
Registered: Jan-05
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - 08:10 am: |
|
Both are really good amp's.
With that said, I would go with the Rockford. Sure it is a little more money, but in my apinion, it is 1 step abuv MTX. |
Bronze Member Username: Atomoswav
Post Number: 17
Registered: Jan-05
|
| Posted on Friday, April 22, 2005 - 02:36 am: |
|
For the money, MTX makes a great amp. I don't think there is anything wrong with fosgate, aside from being a little overpriced.
Also, some people don't like their newer amps because they aren't as good as their older amps. I guess they feel the company let them down. |
Gold Member Username: Taylor17
Kopperl,
Texas
Post Number: 1478
Registered: Jan-05
|
| Posted on Friday, April 22, 2005 - 08:05 am: |
|
Everyone says that, but I haven't seen any proof to back that up.
On RF's website, it shows the spec's of the old mottle, then the specs of the new mottle. There isn't much of a difference, if any, the new ones have been improved. |
|
