| Author |
Thread: Which receiver would be a better choise for B&W ?? |
    
New member Username: Amit145
Post Number: 1
Registered: Apr-08
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 - 08:45 am: |
|
I BOUGHT A NEW 684 B&W SPEAKERS(ALONG WITH THE HTM62 CENTER AND A PAIR OF DM-303 FOR SOROUND SPEAKERS).IM SETTING UP MY NEW 5.1 HT AND HAVE A BIG INDESICION ABOUT TWO RECEIVERS: NAD T744 Vs HK 347.
WHAT WOULD MACTH BETTER FOR THIS SPEAKERS SET UP?
I WANT TO GET A SUPERB SOUND IN STEREO.. |
|
Relevant Product Info
|
|
Silver Member Username: Jrbay
Livonia Detroit area,
Michigan
USA
Post Number: 141
Registered: Feb-08
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 - 08:59 am: |
|
Have you a chance to listen to either of them? |
Silver Member Username: Jrbay
Livonia Detroit area,
Michigan
USA
Post Number: 142
Registered: Feb-08
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 - 09:25 am: |
|
The NAD is a highly regarded receiver that is claimed to be very good for music.
The HK reviews I see confirm what I learned several years ago in that they are simply not user friendly. They do, however sound really good!
I suspect there would be a big enough difference between the two of these that I would make all attempts to audition them prior to making a final decision.
Either way you go you will want a good subwoofer if you don't already have one. |
New member Username: Amit145
Post Number: 2
Registered: Apr-08
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - 02:51 am: |
|
HI JIM BAY
I HAVE HEARED BOTH OF THEM AND THOUGH THE NAD SOUNDED MORE NATURAL THE HK WAS VERY WARM AND DEEP RICHFULL SOUND...
STILL,I DONT KNOW WHAT IS THE RIGHT DECISION..
B.T.W HOW MUCH DO THEY BOTH COST? |
Silver Member Username: Jrbay
Livonia Detroit area,
Michigan
USA
Post Number: 143
Registered: Feb-08
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - 06:53 am: |
|
From Amazon:
NAD T744 - USD $599.99
HK 347 - $458.09
That might make your choice a little easier! |
New member Username: Amit145
Post Number: 4
Registered: Apr-08
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - 07:54 am: |
|
is it saying that the NAD is better?? |
Silver Member Username: Jrbay
Livonia Detroit area,
Michigan
USA
Post Number: 144
Registered: Feb-08
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - 08:36 am: |
|
Not necessarily but if you like the sound of both of them I would go with the cheaper one.
The most important factor is how it sounds to you. If you buy a receiver with a reputable brand name the decision should be made by your ears! |
|
