| Author |
Thread: Better reciever or amp??????? |
    
Bronze Member Username: Killerjimmy
Los Angeles,
CA
United States
Post Number: 26
Registered: Mar-06
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 22, 2006 - 05:59 pm: |
|
I purchased the Klipsch RF-3 home theater system and am so pleased with its soundstage. Realistic and rich.....and loud. It sounds great. I am wondering if it would sound even better if I used a different receiver or added an amplifier. Right now I have a Panasonic XR-55s and no amplifier. I am looking for a more compressed sound. Tighter and more dynamic. Any suggestions?? |
|
|
|
Gold Member Username: Project6
Post Number: 7579
Registered: Dec-03
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 22, 2006 - 07:29 pm: |
|
Any budget? |
Bronze Member Username: Killerjimmy
Los Angeles,
CA
United States
Post Number: 27
Registered: Mar-06
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 22, 2006 - 08:40 pm: |
|
$500 for each. I don't know if an amplifier is necessary being that the room I am using them in is very small. I just want to get more dynamics out of the speakers. |
Gold Member Username: Project6
Post Number: 7581
Registered: Dec-03
|
| Posted on Saturday, April 22, 2006 - 09:02 pm: |
|
I am wondering what is wrong with it at the present. When you write "more dynamics"...what is it that you want to get out of it? |
Gold Member Username: Gavincumm
New York
USA
Post Number: 1009
Registered: Feb-05
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 09:19 am: |
|
do not pair the panny with those great speakers. Its a shame that they aren't made any more. Klipsch really had a great thing going with those. They could really rock a room, had great tight bass, the highs were fantastic, and they imaged rather well. The only thing is that they could sound a little boxy, as many towers in the price range.
here is what I suggest for amps. provided you have a pre-out on the panny...
outlaw audio monoblocks. |
Gold Member Username: Gavincumm
New York
USA
Post Number: 1010
Registered: Feb-05
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 09:20 am: |
|
if you are looking for a more compressed sound, that is the opposite of more dynamic :-) |
Bronze Member Username: Killerjimmy
Los Angeles,
CA
United States
Post Number: 28
Registered: Mar-06
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 12:21 pm: |
|
Gavin,
Sorry about that. Wrong choice of adjectives. Dynamic is what I was trying to say.
I am checking out the outlaw monoblock amp but what should I swap the panny out with? |
Gold Member Username: Project6
Post Number: 7619
Registered: Dec-03
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 10:57 pm: |
|
Outlaw Audio 990. |
|
