Home > Message Board > Home Video > Satellite TV > Archive through November 03, 2009 > Mr, Viewsat pleas quilty
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Mr, Viewsat pleas quilty
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Las

Post Number: 14
Registered: Sep-09
Edit Post

Department of Justice Press Release
For Immediate Release
October 23, 2009 United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of California
Contact: (619) 557-5610
Three Plead Guilty to Violating Digital Millennium Copyright Act
United States Attorney Karen P. Hewitt announced that Jung Kwak, 33, also known as “Mr. Viewsat,” of Oceanside, California, Phillip Allison, 35, also known as “thebroken,” and Robert Ward, 54, also known as “TDG” and as “thedssguy,” both of Seminole, Florida, have tendered pleas of guilty to conspiring to violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The three defendants were charged in a one-count indictment handed up by a federal grand jury sitting in San Diego on July 9, 2009.
In connection with their guilty pleas, the defendants admitted that beginning in or about March 2008, they determined to hire computer hackers to break the latest DISH Network encryption scheme, known as N**** 3, so that the line of satellite receiver boxes sold by defendant Kwak would continue to have a market. According to the indictment, and in connection with their guilty pleas, the defendants admitted that Mr. Kwak owns and operates Viewtech, Inc., in Oceanside, California. Viewtech imports “free-to-air” or “FTA” satellite receiver boxes and sells them to the public through a network of retailers under the brand name “Viewsat.” According to the indictment, there is a limited amount of free programming available by satellite to owners of FTA receiver boxes, much of it consisting of ethnic and religious programming in numerous languages. Yet, millions of Viewsat FTA boxes have been sold to the public. The popularity of FTA boxes is due to the fact that they are designed to make it a simple process for a purchaser to obtain subscription-based satellite television, such as that offered by ************************’s DISH Network, for free. DISH Network licenses copyrighted works from the copyright holders, encrypts the signal, and sells the right to view to DISH subscribers. Subscribers to DISH Network programming obtain from DISH a “smart card,” which is inserted into a DISH satellite receiver box. The smart card decrypts the programming that the subscriber is authorized to view. Over the years, DISH has changed its encryption algorithms and employed other countermeasures to attempt to defeat theft of its signal. To illegally decrypt the DISH signal, the FTA boxes must appear to have DISH smart cards. That is done by reverse-engineering DISH smart cards and creating computer code which, when downloaded to an appropriate FTA box, will emulate the existence of a smart card and trick the system. In the past, as DISH encryption and countermeasures were defeated, the code has been posted on the Internet and made available for download to anyone.
In the late fall of 2007, DISH announced that it had created a new encryption scheme and would start shipping new smart cards to its customers. As the new encryption scheme was deployed, owners of FTA boxes would no longer be able to view DISH programming without a subscription, and sellers of FTA boxes would lose their market.
The defendants admitted in their plea that Mr. Kwak authorized Messrs. Allison and Ward to locate persons to work on cracking N**** 3. Mr. Kwak agreed to provide funding and a substantial reward for success. Messrs. Allison and Ward admitted that they solicited a third party to join the scheme. Mr. Allison admitted purchasing a specialized microscope to be used in dissecting and analyzing smart cards for the third party and was reimbursed by Mr. Kwak. Mr. Kwak admitted meeting with and paying $20,000 in cash to the third party for photographs of a dissected smart card purported to be a N**** 3 card. Mr. Kwak also admitted that he offered a reward of $250,000 if the EPROM (eraseable programmable read-only memory) for the N**** 3 card could be obtained.
The defendants tendered their guilty pleas before United States Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, subject to final acceptance of the pleas by United States District Judge Janis L. Sammartino on January 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m.
This case was investigated by Special Agents of the Cybersquad of Federal Bureau of Investigation in San Diego.
DEFENDANTSCase Number: 09cr2646 -JLS Jung KwakOceanside, CaliforniaAge: 33 Phillip AllisonSeminole, FloridaAge: 35 Robert WardSeminole, FloridaAge: 54 SUMMARY OF CHARGE
One Count — Title 18, United States Code, Section 371: Conspiracy to Violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Maximum Penalty: five years’ imprisonment and $250,000 fine
AGENCY
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Jojogun

Fairfield, CA
United States

Post Number: 565
Registered: Apr-06
Edit Post

Well......so much for an N3 fix for viewsat. But.....I've got backup. It's called Direct TV. The premium package come with all the premium channels. What stinks is I'm gonna have to cough up fifty bucks to watch Cotto knock out the Pac Man.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Farmboy491

Post Number: 107
Registered: Dec-07
Edit Post

I would say that Mr. Kwak is not the only person(s) working on a N3 fix. I would say the Korean Manufactures, out of US regulatory reach, have much more money and initiative. Kwak was probably only one of many of their contacts. JMO
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Platinum Member
Username: Nydas

Post Number: 16388
Registered: Jun-06
Edit Post

I sense a bit of a parallel in an uncontested guilty plea by Madoff and by these guys. In the Madoff case, he is said to be protecting and hiding others and in the Viewtech case it might also be so.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Donnie1973

Post Number: 3230
Registered: May-06
Edit Post

anyone know what sentence they are seeking in the case? Might be pretty light for conspiracy to , not actually doing it. i dunno, thiefs go back to stealing after prison... what else can a kwak do???
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: El_toro_the_great

NC
USA

Post Number: 164
Registered: Jul-09
Edit Post

I would say that Mr. Kwak is the Big thief
and we are the little thief.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Fj45

Post Number: 2
Registered: Feb-09
Edit Post

when you see the DATE of this court action and compare it to the "imminent release" it is sooooo funny!!

Good one, whoever is the funny smart azz.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Imjross

NJ
USA

Post Number: 69
Registered: Aug-07
Edit Post

whoa
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Doa

Post Number: 94
Registered: Jul-06
Edit Post

If I had one of those card sharing boxes, I think I would be shiiting myself about now.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Video > Satellite TV > Archive through November 03, 2009 > Mr, Viewsat pleas quilty [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]