Home > Message Board > Home Video > Rear Projection TVs > Archive through January 15, 2005 > Bottom Line: Samsung -vs- JVC
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Bottom Line: Samsung -vs- JVC
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Nachoman91

Cincinnati, OH
USA

Post Number: 3
Registered: Dec-04
Edit Post

So I have narrowed down my TV selection to the Samsung HLP5063 and the JVC HD-52Z575. I', sure most of you are familiar with both so can someone give me a breakdown of which is the better buy?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Edit Post

JVC hands down. Sharper picture and no moving parts. The 5063 has the HD3 chip which has a much softer picture. If you want to compare sets with similar picture quality you would have to compare the JVC with the samsung 5085, not the 5063.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Dmako

Post Number: 90
Registered: Nov-04
Edit Post

I can't coment on the Samsung. But I did have a Mitsu DLP set and could not stand the rainbows.

Now have a JVC 52Z575.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Discovering
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

I had no idea that JVC has a three chip rear projection! I don't know about the softer picture, but the Samsung's are a single chip with a 9000RPM color wheel. I have the P5063W and while I've weathered some growing pains with it (bulb replaced, color wheel replaced, slight sound sync issue) I think the picture is unmatched. However, I think any single chip set owner wants an affordable 3 chip rear projection (if the picture quality is there.) I thought the 3 chip was only available in front projection high-end displays. I would really like to see a JVC. (wasn't available for my eyes to see) If you have seen them both in person, and the picture looks comparable to you, then the 3 chip JVC is definitely the way to go. Get the extended warranty no matter what. Excellent pricing too! I learn something new every time I come to this forum.

http://www.streetprices.com/Electronics/Consumer/TV/Projection_52in/SP2279214.ht ml

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Murk

Post Number: 7
Registered: Jan-05
Edit Post

Does the JVC 52z575 have replacable bulbs, also i see rainbows on just about every dlp, does this tv have it also?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Dmako

Post Number: 91
Registered: Nov-04
Edit Post

JVC, replacable bulbs, Yes
JVC, rainbows, No
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Mr_lynch

Seattle, WA

Post Number: 395
Registered: Sep-04
Edit Post

JVC, hands down.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Sailbyte

Post Number: 19
Registered: Dec-04
Edit Post

I too purchased the JVC -- side by side in most stores it looked the best (some stores had poorer feed). Because no movable parts (mirrors) the pixels are closer together which gives a sharper picture. I also found it to have a wider viewing angle (i.e., picture remains sharp when watching from the side or standing.

I have also had good luck with JVC for many years now and have all JVC components -- compulink is very nice although there are a few issues (doesn't automatically recogonize digital in). I am so trusting, I decided not to fork out the money for the extended warrenty -- doesn't usually cover the bulb anyway and figured even if had a single service call I would still be ahead.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Discovering
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

I was completely confused by an Infinity Audio ad, which incorrectly describes the JVC as a DLP.

http://www.infinitiphoto.com/viewitem.php?IndexID=5410&RefTag=STREETPRICES

Of course, it is not a DLP. It's a LCOS.

"LCoS (Liquid Crystal on Silicon) has been one of the most eagerly-awaited big-screen TV display technologies. And one of the highest-performing LCoS designs is JVC's D-ILA (Direct-drive Image Light Amplifier)."

My apologies for not researching further.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Video > Rear Projection TVs > Archive through January 15, 2005 > Bottom Line: Samsung -vs- JVC [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]