Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Archives - 2004 > Archive through January 07, 2004 > Front or rear firing speaker???
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Front or rear firing speaker???
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hound dog
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

What's the story? Advantage and disadvantage? Do better speakers tend to be one or the other?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

hound dog
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

I guess this should have gone under speakers. Sorry.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Geekboy

Post Number: 42
Registered: 12-2003
Edit Post

For which speakers? Your front L/R pair or your surrounds?

I have bipolar speakers for my front L/R pair (firing in-phase with drivers of the same type and size mounted on the front and backside of my enclosures) -- Paradigm Reference Eclipse/BP. For people who like music predominantly, I don't usually recommend them as they change the idea of a "suite" spot, where stereo fidelity is easily found.

They can also be problematic if you're sensitive to "reflections" and the butterfly affect (re-resonate) of the objects in your room (harder to tame/fix). Harder, but not impossible. I need to work on my system, but I think I'm moving it to my upstairs bonus room anyhow. (Shorter ceilings 9' instead of 11'4" and carpeting instead of ceramic tile.)

But, they're AWESOME for home theater in where you're not so much looking for a stereo suite-spot but a sound filled room. One thing these puppies do... is FILL the room with sound. They never really get "loud"... just seem to fill the room more.

For surrounds, some like dipoles... some like the traditional monopole (standard front firing speaker). I like monopoles... but had considered the Paradigm ADP-450 dipoles. I think the Dipoles would be great for 7.1 systems as the Rear Surround channel, since it's not discrete (it's matrixed).

But then again, I know my tastes and what I like. Your Mileage May Vary. I've come a long way... from radio shack speakers (yes, really, even their center channel), to Acoustic Research, to Bose Acoustimas, to Klipsch (CF-2), to Paradigm.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

hound dog
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

Geekboy, For the fronts. I listen to mostly music--all kinds. I may be confuse, but Why do some speakers have a sound hole on the front and some on the back? Does this have anything to do with "firing"?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Geekboy

Post Number: 43
Registered: 12-2003
Edit Post

hound dog: oh, the "port" that they have. Sorry. I'm no expert on port design or anything. Direction of the firing port will have some affect on the sound. My Eclipse biploars have a large port on the bottom BACK of the enclosures. My speakers are 18" from the back wall. If you have rear-firing ports, placement of the speaker will be essential. You don't want to have the speakers up against the wall. This will affect the soundfield from the port and maybe even air flow?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Disco_stan

Post Number: 22
Registered: 12-2003
Edit Post

I wouldn't think so..though I am kinda a noob so I may be worng. The fronts I use have one port on the back side and my sub dual 4" ports on the bottom.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Geekboy

Post Number: 44
Registered: 12-2003
Edit Post

matt: you mean for a rear firing port? No, you don't want that up against a wall. Alot of subwoofers are sealed or have "downward firing" ports... which is by design. For regular drivers (not the subwoofers), a rear firing port should not be "blocked" and certainly should not be too close to the rear wall.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Disco_stan

Post Number: 24
Registered: 12-2003
Edit Post

Haha, thats not my concern. My speaker placement is fine. So what are the advantages of a "downward firing" port vs. a "frontward firing" port? What would happen if you place the sub with the "downward firing" ports on a hard surface like a wooden floor compared a floor with carpet or a rug under the sub? How would that affect the sound.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Geekboy

Post Number: 45
Registered: 12-2003
Edit Post

matt: I don't know the answer to that. I have a downward firing subwoofer myself. It's sits on "ceramic tile". Lower frequencies behave different from higher frequencies from a reflection (resonate) point. I'm sure it would be somewhat different vs. carpet with a "wood" underflooring. (I use to be in an apartment with carpet and wood underflooring. My house... in that Family Room... has 18" ceramic tile with a concrete slab underneath.) Overall the lowest frequencies (audible and sub-audible bass) have less problems with reflections due the the wavelength being longer.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Archives - 2004 > Archive through January 07, 2004 > Front or rear firing speaker??? [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]