Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Phono > Archive through December 29, 2004 > Ortofon Super OM-10 better than Music...
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Ortofon Super OM-10 better than Music Hall Tracker?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MikeyD
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

I recently purchased a Music Hall MMF-2.1 turntable, which came with the factory installed and set up Music Hall Tracker cartridge (Goldring Elan?). I have an Ortofon Super OM-10 that I just bought for my old Dual CS505-2 before determining that the cartridge wasn't the problem after all.

I'm not familiar with the Goldring cartridges, and haven't found any direct comparison information. Would the Ortofon represent an upgrade?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Unregistered guest
Edit Post

Depends on the mass of the tonearm. If it's a low mass arm, like a Linn, HK, B&O, etc you'll want a high compliance cartridge. If it's high mass, like Technics, Pioneer, etc, you'll want lower compliance. It's all about avoiding audable resonance in the arm/table/cartridge.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MikeyD
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

I don't have actual specs on the effective mass of the tonearm or a recommended cartridge compliance.

Music Hall advertises it as a medium mass tonearm, but it is a straight, aluminum arm unlike the S arms used by Pioneer, Technics, etc. The Pro-Ject Debut comes with an Ortofon OM-5e, it is basically the same table although the arms are slightly different so comparison may not be completely valid. While I don't have specific numbers, I am reasonably confident that the cartridge/tonearm combination will not have a resonance in the audible range.

I have the OM-10, so there's really no out of pocket cost just to try it. Neither cartridge is broken in yet so it will be some time before I can do a valid comparison. Twenty years ago the process was the fun part, but at this point I'd just as soon skip it if one cartridge or the other is clearly better.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Jim_mcbob

Post Number: 7
Registered: Nov-04
Edit Post

on a related topic, I know the ORTOFON OM-10/20/30 feature interchangable replacement styli (so one can upgrade). Is the OM-5 also a part of this bargain, or is it the odd man out, ORTOFONically speaking?

Or to put it another way: If I get a MusicHall or Pro-Ject TT w/the OM-5, can I later upgrade the cartridge with a better ORTOFON stylus?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Disco_stan

Minnesota

Post Number: 175
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

mauimusicman-
Could you please educate me more about tonearm mass? I have just bought a Aristion Q deck with a B&O MMC 10 E cartridge.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Phono > Archive through December 29, 2004 > Ortofon Super OM-10 better than Music... [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]