| Author |
Thread: Nad vs adcom |
    
|
| Posted on Friday, June 11, 2004 - 06:18 am: |
|
just would like to know the quality differences to go with my bose 901 thankyou |
|
|
|
|
| Posted on Friday, June 11, 2004 - 10:17 pm: |
|
is this a difficult question? |
Unregistered guest |
| Posted on Saturday, June 12, 2004 - 06:42 am: |
|
Replace the 901's |
|
| Posted on Sunday, June 13, 2004 - 11:44 pm: |
|
which one is a better chioce of amp the adcom or the Nad. |
Silver Member Username: Soccer
Post Number: 165
Registered: Apr-04
|
| Posted on Monday, June 14, 2004 - 12:48 pm: |
|
AdCom no doubt |
|
| Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 - 10:45 pm: |
|
thankyou
|
|
| Posted on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 - 10:49 pm: |
|
how come people here dont really talk about AdCom and only talk about NAD. the prices of adcom are not bad when compaired to NAD. also the adcom supplies more watts than NAD. |
|
| Posted on Friday, June 18, 2004 - 01:42 pm: |
|
True - This site has a cult-like following for NAD. From what I understand, it's the best way to go for individuals who cannot afford seperate components at this time. |
Bronze Member Username: Sun_king
Leeds,
West Yorkshire
UK
Post Number: 95
Registered: Mar-04
|
| Posted on Friday, June 18, 2004 - 10:33 pm: |
|
Nad just gives a good sound and good value. Lots of better stuff out there....but lots of worse too (that costs more) |
swampcat Unregistered guest |
| Posted on Saturday, June 19, 2004 - 03:12 pm: |
|
GO ADCOM !!! good stuff , not exspensive. My Adcom 555 and 545 are 20 years and going strong. I read in Stereophile new adcom amps are better? |
Silver Member Username: Soccer
Post Number: 203
Registered: Apr-04
|
| Posted on Saturday, June 19, 2004 - 07:08 pm: |
|
Don't just read, go and try to listen to them
Enjoy |
swampcat Unregistered guest |
| Posted on Sunday, June 20, 2004 - 08:33 pm: |
|
you are correct, I only know the old adcom and was very reliable and quite good in 1985 and still works well in 2004. I dont see nad anywhere in phila area . Very popular on web site forums though. I'll keep looking though , not to buy ,but just to listen, thats for sure ,just to see what the love for this equiptment is all about? No reason to replace adcoms thats for sure not to much difference in solid state amps in this price range anyway ,truly superior amps cost much more . |
Bronze Member Username: Sun_king
Leeds,
West Yorkshire
UK
Post Number: 98
Registered: Mar-04
|
| Posted on Sunday, June 20, 2004 - 08:44 pm: |
|
I think there's a lot of difference between say the Nad C320BEE, the Rotel RA01/02 and the Cambridge Audio Azur range. All three sound very different....and they're budget amps. |
anonymous joe Unregistered guest |
| Posted on Sunday, June 20, 2004 - 09:20 pm: |
|
greetings swampcat, you can listen to NAD at SURROUND SOUNDS in Exton, not too far from philly, 610/524-6900. BTW, I think nad is a very good integrated, a lot of punch and musicality for the money and more bass than small Rotel integrated...also the CD players and receivers are strong values....separates are a different story, IMO Rotel B&K and possibly Adcom are better than NAD. |
Silver Member Username: Sun_king
Leeds,
West Yorkshire
UK
Post Number: 102
Registered: Mar-04
|
| Posted on Sunday, June 20, 2004 - 10:05 pm: |
|
Yes, I concur. Nothing beats the Nad C320BEE at the price in my opinion and all the Nad integrated amps are good value and have a good sound. Once you start looking to separates then you're walking into a whole new field. |
