Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Marantz 7500 vs HK 247
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days
Author Thread: Marantz 7500 vs HK 247
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Preposterous

Post Number: 1
Registered: Mar-08
Edit Post

Hello fellow Audio enthusiasts

I am looking to set up a modest 2.1 system for 100% audio use in my den (approximately 12 X 12 Ft) and have bought a couple of Paradigm titan monitors and a Hsu research subwoofer (STF 2). I intend to use this setup as an auxiliary bedroom surround sound system down the road (girlfriend says, it's either her or a speaker system in the bedroom for the moment - I almost chose the speaker setup ) and need your advice on a receiver. I know I will be upgrading my receiver when I use it as part of an HT setup so I am not looking to spend more than $300-400. I have the option of a Marantz 7500 for about $335 (*used in good shape) or an HK 247 (new) for the same price. The Marantz deal goes away tomorrow and I need to pull the trigger soon. Please help!!!

Preposterous
Relevant Product Info
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Afj

Gaborone
Botswana

Post Number: 13
Registered: Jan-08
Edit Post

i had a hk3480 which i just got rid off. wasnt too hot for stereo. go through the link below
http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/1/449968.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Preposterous

Post Number: 3
Registered: Mar-08
Edit Post

Thank you for the response Francis. This was of great help. I guess the Marantz is the way to go then :-).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Afj

Gaborone
Botswana

Post Number: 15
Registered: Jan-08
Edit Post

well, haven't heard the marantz so wouldn't know if its the way to go. but hk isn't the way to go for stereo
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Shawnharman

Post Number: 171
Registered: Dec-05
Edit Post

vik, keep in mind that this just francis's opinion, alot of people love H/K for the money even for stereo, I know I love mine, I have never heard the marantz, but I like the H/K 247. its good for the money. so I would go and listen if I were you.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Preposterous

Post Number: 4
Registered: Mar-08
Edit Post

Shawnboy, thank you for the advice. I am certainly having a difficult time deciding. I listened to both and other than the fact that I am apprehensive about buying something used, the Marantz does output a more warm sound with slightly better sound imaging. My only issue is in determining if the technology in the Marantz is a little dated.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Nickelbut10

Post Number: 1255
Registered: Jun-07
Edit Post

Listen to it Vik, see what your ears tell u. It depends on what sort of quality your use to. Personally I still have a H/K635 here, and personally think it sounds like crap. Again, my opinion.Cheers.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Afj

Gaborone
Botswana

Post Number: 17
Registered: Jan-08
Edit Post

vik, seems like you're back where you started. i guess whatever your ears tell you

shawn, not trying to be funny or anything and parts in the music range of the hk sounded really good. but as nick said the music had a lot of holes inbetween where it sounded very basic. have you taken another amp and switched between the two and compared. i was running my speakers on a kenwood previously and when i switched to the hk i did like certain parts of the bass better - it was tighter. plucking on a guitar was brilliant. but overall i had a better listening experience with the kenwood esp the mids
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Preposterous

Post Number: 5
Registered: Mar-08
Edit Post

I auditioned both receivers with the obsession that would have reminded people of Vladimir Nabokov's "Lolita." In the end, I favored the Marantz over the HK. The Marantz just produced richer more natural sounds and did a fantastic job with the sound imaging. Of course, I don't think comparing the Marantz with the HK was fair. The Marantz is a THX select certified receiver that retailed for close to $800 a couple of years ago. Thank you guys for all your help. Happy listening!
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image
Username: Need to Register?
Password: Forgot Password?
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out |
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Marantz 7500 vs HK 247 [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]