| Author |
Thread: Nad biamping question |
   
Bronze Member Username: Davidhue
Post Number: 12 Registered: Nov-06
|
| Posted on Monday, April 02, 2007 - 09:15 am: |
|
hi, any expert opinion would be appreciated.i have recently purchased the nad c372 int.amp and would like to biamp in the near future.would i be better off purchasing the nad c272 power amp, or as i have read about in some forums ,go for the c162 pre.amp and use the c372 as a power amp? cheers. |
|
Relevant Product Info
|
|
   
Bronze Member Username: Dmitchell
Post Number: 30 Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Monday, April 02, 2007 - 10:04 am: |
|
I'm soon (hopefully) purchasing the NAD C272. The guys at the high-end audio shop where I buy my stuff do say that bi-amping is the recommend configuration for this amp. |
   
New member Username: Pkmaven
Boynton Beach,
FL
United States
Post Number: 3 Registered: Mar-07
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - 01:46 pm: |
|
Many guys want to improve their sound and think of buying better speakers or a new amplifier. Never change anything in your system unless you can hear a difference. Bi-amping is the first major step in improving any system. A crossover, either independant and active or one integrated into the sub amplifier will work. Most speakers are unable to reproduce the deepest bass found on all newer cds, but a subwoofer 10" or larger, will make a very audible improvement. Put it between your speakers. Make sure your tweeters are at your ear level. Rock on! |
   
Bronze Member Username: Davidhue
Post Number: 13 Registered: Nov-06
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - 06:52 pm: |
|
hi,thanks for replies.i do have a subwoofer :mj acoustics ref 100.my speakers are acoustic energy aelites.i would appreciate comments directed more at my original query though. thanks. |
   
Gold Member Username: My_rantz
Australia
Post Number: 1315 Registered: Nov-05
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - 07:26 pm: |
|
The NAD C272 is configured for bi-wiring. For bi-amping one would need two amps. |
   
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 6619 Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - 08:09 pm: |
|
I cannot imagine a dealer finding a 272 amp designed for bi-amping, either, MR. And for a dealer to suggest the unit is made for bi-wiring is isleading. |
   
Bronze Member Username: Davidhue
Post Number: 14 Registered: Nov-06
|
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - 10:59 pm: |
|
"For bi-amping one would need two amps" yes m.r. i intend getting another amp.that is what my original post details.i have the c 372,i would like advice/opinion on what other nad amp would be best for biamping with it. regards. |
   
Gold Member Username: My_rantz
Australia
Post Number: 1316 Registered: Nov-05
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - 12:38 am: |
|
Another of the same I think would be preferable David, though perhaps someone else may know better.. Nuck this: "And for a dealer to suggest the unit is made for bi-wiring is isleading." I think you meant bi-amping. The C272 is designed for a bi-wiring alternative. And no dealer should islead anyone (grin). |
   
Bronze Member Username: Dmitchell
Post Number: 34 Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - 07:21 am: |
|
Yes, I think what I meant to say was "bi-wiring". Sorry for the confusion. |
|
|
   
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 6627 Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - 08:18 am: |
|
Sorry, working with 2 (d)Davids here, a tad confused. |