| Author |
Thread: If you had 2K |
    
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 2
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 11:26 am: |
|
I've almost got this much earmarked for a new 7.1 system. I haven't finished picking out a new AV receiver yet either. So far I like the KEF KHT 3005 series and the SVS SBS-01 series.
What other speaker systems should I consider? |
|
|
|
Silver Member Username: Exerciseguy
Brooklyn,
NY
USA
Post Number: 863
Registered: Oct-04
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 11:43 am: |
|
Is this for a dedicated Home Theater room? Because if it isn't, you might want to consider stepping-down the number of surround speakers, as this will allow you to allocate more of your funds towards a receiver & speakers.
Will this set-up for music listening at all? What percentage? |
Silver Member Username: Stefanom
Vienna,
VA
United States
Post Number: 346
Registered: Apr-06
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 12:02 pm: |
|
How big is your room? Have you actually listened to the above mentioned speakers? |
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 3
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 02:00 pm: |
|
Yes - it is for a dedicated home theatre room. I have an older Onkyo 5.1 matched speaker system in there now which is OK, but not great. Room dimensions are 16ft X 12ft with 8ft ceilings. My family tends to watch movies, sports, TV - not so much pure music.
I've been able to listen to the KEF's at Circuit City, some Polks at Magnolia, and some Bose so far. |
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 4
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 02:06 pm: |
|
I reread your posts. To clarify, I have almost 2K saved for speakers. I've got separate money for a receiver. |
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 5
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 02:07 pm: |
|
I rearead your posts and to clarify, I have almost 2K saved for speakers. I've got other money saved for a receiver. |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5652
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 02:15 pm: |
|
Tony, with that kind of scratch, you can do much better than a rceiver.
Is HT the #1 concern?
5.1 movies? |
Silver Member Username: Stefanom
Vienna,
VA
United States
Post Number: 352
Registered: Apr-06
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 02:17 pm: |
|
Well for Internet Direct speakers, there is always Ascend and Onix/AV123, in addition to the SVS system.
For other speakers you can actually listen to, take a look at NHT, Klipsch, Infinity, Mirage, and Energy for starters.
Next question: how is your room furnished? A lot of hard/reflective surfaces, or a lot of carpeting, etc that absorb sound? |
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 6
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 02:36 pm: |
|
Thanks for your response Stephen. The room has two expanded open spaces that lead to other rooms. It's got a big old 12ft U shaped leather sofa in the listening position and a thick carpet. The back speakers will be relatively close to the listeners - probably less than a foot. |
Gold Member Username: Hawk
Highlands Ranch,
CO
USA
Post Number: 1139
Registered: Dec-03
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 09:37 pm: |
|
Tony:
Frankly, your listening space is too small for a 7.1 system. You won't miss anything, as there is nothing encoded into 7.1 sound--the receiver just creates two extra channels by blending elements of the other five channels. The whole purpose of 7.1 is to provide extra points of sound to fill a large room, but your room isn't that large to require more speakers. The benefit to you is the ability to afford a higher quality system by buying two fewer speakers.
Now, I really like the KEF 3005 system, and it does come with a pretty good subwoofer, as well. But let me suggest a few alternatives that are better than the KEFs (Bose and Polk systems are far less impressive), IMO.
1. NHT Classic Twos, Center Two, and Sub Ten. Since you have a small room, here is a speaker system that is barely larger than the Kefs, but with a bigger midrange/woofer, will do a much better job of filling your room with sound, but will not take over the room, either:
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=NHTKC2B
The Classic Twos are a sealed speaker, so they do not require you mount them on stands three feet from the wall, the usual standard for rear ported speakers. I also like this dealer as you can order the system and get 30 days to try them in your home--if they don't work for you, just sent them back.
2. Energy RC-10s, RC-LCR, and C-R100 surrounds. The RC stands for Energy's Reference Connoisseur line of speakers, a very high quality speaker line. Small, but with a beautiful finish, and capable of producing superb sound, the RC-10s make wonderful main speakers:
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENRC10
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENRCLCR
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=ENCR100
The surrounds here are a "bi-pole" design which may be a great choice given how close the rear speaker will be with the listeners. Bi-poles shoot their sound into two different directions, so that you are not so aware of the source of the sound--a nice feature if you are only a foot away. These mount directly to the wall, thus saving space (I assume you have a rear wall, but maybe not). You can then add the subwoofer you want, although I would recommend the Hsu STF-1. You simply will not believe how good this small subwoofer is--it will go lower than almost any other sub under $500 and will fit well into your room:
http://www.hsuresearch.com/products/stf-1.html
3. Epos 5.1 sytem with NAD receiver. I came across this deal and was knocked out by the value. The Epos ELS speakers are becoming a bit of a legend, with magazines such as Stereophile and Absolute Sound singing their praises as the best speakers in the world at their price point. Add to that a high quality NAD receiver, and you have a killer combo:
http://www.spearitsound.com/epos/fun51system.asp
4. Dynaudio 42Ws with a 42C. Another speaker legend which will mount directly to the wall. More expensive than the other speakers mentioned here, but still within your budget:
http://www.dynaudiousa.com/products/audience/42wall/aud42w.htm
Again, I love the Hsu STF-1, but the Outlaw LFM-2 is also a great choice:
http://www.outlawaudio.com/products/lfm2.html
Finally, simply selecting a good speaker system without matching it to the right receiver is a prescription for wasting a lot of money and being left unhappy--I know from personal experience. So, with either the NHT system or the Energy systems I recommended, I would strongly suggest a Marantz, NAD, or Outlaw receiver. These would have the requisite sonic charecteristics to get the most out of these speakers. You didn't mention a budget for the receiver, but you can get a very high quality receiver from any of these three brands from $500 to $1K.
Enjoy! |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5670
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 09:50 pm: |
|
Hawk, did you miss anything?
LOL, great response for Tony!
Tony, there you have a goodly selection to look into, now go and listen!
The outlaws are brawney, and have a phono section as well. |
Gold Member Username: Artk
Albany,
Oregon
USA
Post Number: 3880
Registered: Feb-05
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 09:57 pm: |
|
Good post Hawk...I would add Paradigm and PSB to that mix as they represent whopping values for the dollar.
Epos makes fabulous sounding speakers but they can be just a bit demanding on amps so if you were to chose them be sure that you can take them back if your receiver has difficulty delivering the goods. Same with Dyns. And actually so too with NHT. I've owned NHT speakers and really liked their sound but my Rotel RSX965 needed augmented to meet their demands.
Energy's RC series is easy to drive but the C and Veritas lines require a bit more.
Happy shopping! |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5673
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 10:20 pm: |
|
Art, which Psb's are you liking?
Tony's space seems a fit for T45's in front, the B25's might be a bit much given the near field as describedin the rears. Perhaps Alpha's back there. |
Gold Member Username: Artk
Albany,
Oregon
USA
Post Number: 3881
Registered: Feb-05
|
| Posted on Friday, February 02, 2007 - 10:25 pm: |
|
That seems about right Nuck 45's or 55's front and the matching center. Get as close to the series in front with the rears as possible. That's why there is a volume control for each channel. |
Gold Member Username: Joe_c
Atlanta,
GA
USA
Post Number: 1365
Registered: Mar-05
|
| Posted on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 12:10 am: |
|
Hawk, although I agree with almost everything you say (and your posts are very informative) I would have to disagree with the not missing anything with 7.1. I have found that there was a huge difference with 7.1 over 5.1 in my modest 14 x 16 ht. Even if the source material is 5.1 the effects given by most receivers have much more of a blended, non directional sound. I find that the rears project more of a 3-d sound field with more depth and space to the effects. This is really noticed when sounds in the rear channels travel from left to right or visa versa. When used with 6.1 material, this effect is multiplied exponentially (and there are many 6.1 discs to be had out there). Not to mention that the 7.1 setup will be more future proof with the hd formats already a big factor in HT. This of course is my humble opinion. |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5689
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 12:24 am: |
|
JC, the last 2.0 is a mixed mono from the source, ja? |
Gold Member Username: Joe_c
Atlanta,
GA
USA
Post Number: 1366
Registered: Mar-05
|
| Posted on Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 12:41 am: |
|
If source is 5.1 yes, if 6.1 or dd ex no, it is then a discrete mix. Still has a better transition (even vs. dipoles) if the speakers and listening position are in order. |
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 7
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 01:02 pm: |
|
I've been away from the board since Friday AM - thank you all so much for your thoughtful insights. I really really appreciate it. Will keep you posted on decisions. Now about that receiver . . . . and HDMI 1.3 - where to begin? |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5761
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 01:05 pm: |
|
Tony, just ignore it, for the sound system.
Keep the video seperate and it won't matter.
Less electronic clutter in the way, too. Maybe get a better power supply. |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5762
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 01:08 pm: |
|
Oh and an external HDMI swithbox.
So much for less clutter.
Frigging hobby is a pain sometimes. |
Gold Member Username: Dakulis
Spokane,
Washington
United States
Post Number: 1061
Registered: May-05
|
| Posted on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 07:02 pm: |
|
Hi guys,
Just got back from a trip to Seattle. I would add the ERAs in there for 5.1 if he can get the dealer to come off their $899/pair list price and put in the ERA cemter amd a decemt HSU sub.
I was amazed at the ERA sound. I suspect that if I had heard them first my Ascends would have gone back and I would be listening to 4 of these ERAs with the ERA small center and my sub.
Dave. |
Gold Member Username: Artk
Albany,
Oregon
USA
Post Number: 3914
Registered: Feb-05
|
| Posted on Monday, February 05, 2007 - 09:06 pm: |
|
The Hsu sub would not keep up with the Era speakers I'm afraid. That's why Era makes the fabulous subs that they do. |
Silver Member Username: Polksavage
Post Number: 125
Registered: Jun-06
|
| Posted on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 02:12 pm: |
|
http://www.polkaudio.com/homeaudio/products/systems/floorsystems/showsystem.php? id=231
this is a good system which will sound good with music and movies. It's only a 5.1 but for the room your using it in you won't need more than that. You can add another csi3 for a 6th channel if you wish.
here is a good cheap reciever
http://cgi.ebay.ca/AVR-887-DENON-7-1-A-V-SURROUND-RECEIVER-AVR887-NEW_W0QQitemZ2 50079350187QQihZ015QQcategoryZ39793QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
will sound good with this system |
New member Username: Talbrecht
Post Number: 8
Registered: Feb-07
|
| Posted on Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 12:42 pm: |
|
UPDATE: OK, new poll open - given the choice would you pick:
1. KEH KHT 3005
2. ORB MOD2
3. Gallo A'Diva T1
4. DefTech ProCinema
The polls are now open - please no write-in candidates - tune into CNN for local, live updates. |
Gold Member Username: Dakulis
Spokane,
Washington
United States
Post Number: 1069
Registered: May-05
|
| Posted on Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 08:38 pm: |
|
Art,
Thanks for the information. I asked the sales guy to play an ERA sub but the ERA wasn't hooked up so he used another sub that spectacularly underwhelming. Really boomy and made the ERAs sound worse. They actually provided incredible base for a small speaker, although probably in the ballpark with Tim's Emmas but not quite that low.
Anyway, why hasn't anyone suggested Emmas to this poor man, now that I think about it. I would have to hear the ERAs and Emmas together to make a choice here. I haven't heard any of your choices above so good luck Tony. Dave |
Gold Member Username: My_rantz
Australia
Post Number: 1119
Registered: Nov-05
|
| Posted on Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 08:49 pm: |
|
Dave, Tim's selling DYI stuff now, I don't know if he has any Emmas left. Cheers M.R. |
Bronze Member Username: Bytesiz
Bangor,
Maine
USA
Post Number: 29
Registered: Jan-06
|
| Posted on Friday, February 09, 2007 - 10:06 am: |
|
Actually, I think he does have a few pair left...
http://www.us.alegriaaudio.com/Emma.htm |
