| Author |
Thread: Anyone owned B & K |
    
Bronze Member Username: Db77
Salem,
NH
Post Number: 11
Registered: Dec-06
|
| Posted on Thursday, December 21, 2006 - 09:39 pm: |
|
I looked into B & K recievers when I was my purchasing my system but was unable to find a local dealer that carried them. Has anyone ever owned one or used them? |
|
|
|
Gold Member Username: Jan_b_vigne
Dallas,
TX
Post Number: 9531
Registered: May-04
|
| Posted on Friday, December 22, 2006 - 10:15 am: |
|
.
Not a receiver but their separates. |
Bronze Member Username: Db77
Salem,
NH
Post Number: 13
Registered: Dec-06
|
| Posted on Friday, December 22, 2006 - 01:24 pm: |
|
Well........
How did you like them Jan?
What did you own?
How did it sound?
Was it worth the money?
How would you compare them to brands like Arcam, NAD, Rotel? |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 4992
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Friday, December 22, 2006 - 06:48 pm: |
|
You are beating a dead turnip, DB.
Y'all might just to hav'n to call Buffalo and ask them.
They do answer, and are as friendly and helpful as Outlaw. |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 4993
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Friday, December 22, 2006 - 06:48 pm: |
|
They do good subs, that much I know. |
Silver Member Username: Jethro
Lansing,
Mi
Post Number: 134
Registered: Jan-06
|
| Posted on Saturday, December 23, 2006 - 03:22 am: |
|
demoed the 507s2 receiver vs the rotel 1068 and pio 84 in same room with klipsch rf7 ht setup dual klipsch subs etc.. couldn't tell much difference between them for HT to tell you the truth. For music only, the pioneer was outclassed and I preferred the B&k over the rest. It seemed to have more finesse and tamed the klipsch speakers a bit.
I think Nuck is referring to M&k when he says they do good subs however. |
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 5007
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Saturday, December 23, 2006 - 07:36 am: |
|
Thank you Jeff, correct.
I read that they were associated somehow, and struggle for the link. |
|
