| Author |
Thread: Which kind of receiver |
    
New member Username: Johnrob69
Oklahoma city,
Oklahoma
USA
Post Number: 1
Registered: Nov-06
|
| Posted on Wednesday, November 15, 2006 - 01:23 am: |
|
I want to play just music, i dont really care about home theater, or surround sound, is there a better type of receiver better for just that |
|
|
|
Gold Member Username: Nuck
Post Number: 4612
Registered: Dec-04
|
| Posted on Wednesday, November 15, 2006 - 05:22 am: |
|
The Outlaw R2150 stereo receiver is quite complete. It has high power, can drive difficult speakers, has a sub out with bass management and a phono section. |
Silver Member Username: Gamerdude
Ontario
Canada
Post Number: 263
Registered: Apr-06
|
| Posted on Wednesday, November 15, 2006 - 04:47 pm: |
|
Nice last name  |
Gold Member Username: Frank_abela
Berkshire
UK
Post Number: 1735
Registered: Sep-04
|
| Posted on Thursday, November 16, 2006 - 12:16 pm: |
|
John,
The best is to separate into an integrated amplifier and tuner. There are two benefits to this:
1. Both tuner and amplifier are likely to benefit from the quieter environment in their respective boxes.
2. You'll get far more choice. Receivers fell out of favour in the 90s so your choices are fairly limited. there are loads of tuner and amplifier separates.
At this point it'd be question of budget...
Regards,
Frank. |
Bronze Member Username: Mike53
Post Number: 11
Registered: Oct-06
|
| Posted on Thursday, November 16, 2006 - 01:58 pm: |
|
John, I've been researching receivers as well as tuners and integrated amps over the last few months. The choice of 2 channel stereo receivers is limited, as Frank pointed out. There are a couple very nice ones to choose from - check out NAD, Rotel, Music Hall, Yamaha, Marantz, Denon and the Outlaw, that Nuck mentioned. All are good choices it just depends on what options you require. |
|
