Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Archive through December 25, 2006 > Odd question
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Odd question
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Cluelessonaudio

Post Number: 5
Registered: Nov-06
Edit Post

What is with the little faces?

anyway, i bought a pretty basic yamaha surround reciever from best buy prior to having known anything about what i wanted. I was wondering if anyone knew how to break it without voiding the stupid protection plan i purchased from them. I was looking to get a newer model with HDMI, and i do not need two receivers plus the cash i could apply from the prior purchase would allow me to get the model i want now.

basically, anyone know how to blow a amplifier in a safe way?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Shawnharman

Post Number: 25
Registered: Dec-05
Edit Post

how long ago did you buy the receiver???? if it hasnt been 30 days you can take it back and get your money back, I dont see any point in breaking your amp, what will that do for you. all they will do is fix it for you. or just sell that one on ebay or something.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Jan_b_vigne

Dallas, TX

Post Number: 9350
Registered: May-04
Edit Post

.

You could get a long extension cord and while it's powered up, toss it into a bathtub full of water. The damage won't look like anything that would result from defective parts and they won't fix it or give you credit for doing some thing so incredibly stupid but the receiver would be "broken". And depending on how much alchohol you had before you tried this, you might get about 30 seconds worth of entertainment out of this adventure in electrocution.

.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Jan_b_vigne

Dallas, TX

Post Number: 9351
Registered: May-04
Edit Post

.


The faces are there to bother people who wonder why they are there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: My_rantz


Australia

Post Number: 934
Registered: Nov-05
Edit Post

An odd question deserves an odd answer. I guess you aren't let down.

Here's a little face: :-(
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3668
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

I would try the San Quentin website, ask for their fraud expert.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 4603
Registered: Dec-04
Edit Post

Why not save face and sell it privately?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Platinum Member
Username: Project6

Post Number: 11478
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

Yup, much better than fraud.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3673
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

I believe face is already lost.....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 4609
Registered: Dec-04
Edit Post

Face the music as you would face the world...with an honesty that belies opinion.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Jaw

Post Number: 63
Registered: Mar-06
Edit Post

I'd like to face it with Edvard Munch's "The Scream" that typically applies to many audio topics. Unfortunately, I'll get edited again.

Since when is a Masterpiece Painting not relevant to Music, Arts and Satire?

fascists.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Archive through December 25, 2006 > Odd question [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]