Home > Message Board > Home Audio > CD Players > Archive through January 15, 2007 > Music Hall 25.2 vs NAD542
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Music Hall 25.2 vs NAD542
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Jingka99

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Post Number: 8
Registered: Aug-06
Edit Post

Hi, I would like to ask your opinion on these two CDPs, which one would you prefer?

Thanks

Any other suggestion for CDP aside from these two?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Stu_pitt

Irvington, New York
USA

Post Number: 1446
Registered: May-05
Edit Post

It depends on the rest of the system and what you like. If you have a Music Hall integrated amp/receiver, then I'd advise the Music Hall. If you have NAD gear, then NAD would be my choice.

They have different sound charecteristics and trade offs. They are both considered very good by many people. However, neither one is perfect.

Personally, I think the Music Hall sounds dull. I don't find it exciting or lively in any way. Then again, I like components with some livelyness or "swing" to them. The NAD does a good job of this at its price point. A lot of people here believe the NAD is the CD player to beat for $500, and I agree.

Also, Music Hall hasn't had the best track record in reliability. Generally speaking, NAD are pretty well built (their's a huge debate about A/V receivers, but not much about 2 channel stereo gear).

Personally, I wouldn't consider the Music Hall, but my ears and musical tastes probably aren't what yours are. If possible, you should hear the two CD players side by side to get your own point of view.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3529
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

It has been my experience that Music Hall gear is low on the reliability scale. NAD is a good sounding solid performer and a heck of a good deal for the money
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 4047
Registered: Dec-04
Edit Post

I agree with the esteemed posters previous.
You can beat the Nad easily, checkbook in hand.
If you have a chance, arnold, try the Rotel 1072, Rock and Roll personified, otherwise, the Nad is a hands down winner.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Edster922

Abubala, Ababala
The Occupation

Post Number: 4521
Registered: Mar-05
Edit Post

Yeah but the Shmobel MX-928 with dual disk stabilizer and computer controlled cadenter blows 'em all out of the water!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Nuck

Post Number: 4052
Registered: Dec-04
Edit Post

Ed, yer a weenie.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3531
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

Hey Ed don't forget to put a metronome in the room with it....improves timing....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Jingka99

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Post Number: 9
Registered: Aug-06
Edit Post

Thanks guys for the inputs, I actually have a NAD C352...

Originally my plan is to get a NAD cdp as my amp is also a NAD but some say that the NAD C352 is a warm sounding amp and if coupled with a NAD cdp which is also warm sounding may not produce good sound result, some recommend to pair the 352 with Cambridge C540v2 because the 352 is warm and the C540v2 is lively which they say might produce some balance...

Also, I am considering the C521BEE cdp, will this be a good match up with the C532?

As I am currently now in Taiwan, I found a locally manufactured cdp, the manufacturer is Usher Audio and they have this cpd they call Usher CD-1, anybody heard about this?

thanks to all!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Uback007

Post Number: 124
Registered: Mar-06
Edit Post

I would look at Cambridge Audio cd players too.
They sound tops for the money
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Uback007

Post Number: 125
Registered: Mar-06
Edit Post

sorry, I see that you already know about the Cambridge..
I would probably go with a NAD 542 if the rest of your kit is NAD...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Edster922

Abubala, Ababala
The Occupation

Post Number: 4523
Registered: Mar-05
Edit Post

thanks Art, I'll pick up a metronome as soon as I finish paying off my $300 zinc-tipped power cord which I have elevated exactly 6 1/2" off the floor between my CDP and my Quadrupus tr8000 Power Optimizer.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3533
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

lol!!! Hey Ed did you ever try out the cd cleaning. Add the Zaino Z-6 and wow, it really is something special...no really..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Edster922

Abubala, Ababala
The Occupation

Post Number: 4524
Registered: Mar-05
Edit Post

actually yes I did, didn't hear much of a difference. It did make one of my DVDs not skip though.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Petergalbraith

Rimouski, Quebec
Canada

Post Number: 1859
Registered: Feb-04
Edit Post

As I am currently now in Taiwan, I found a locally manufactured cdp, the manufacturer is Usher Audio and they have this cpd they call Usher CD-1, anybody heard about this?

No, but you should definately look into it! It looks to be very nicely built anyway.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3536
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

The Zaino Z-6 is far more effective and much cleaner to use for cd cleaning than the Pledge. I've retired the Pledge.

Arnold, never heard of the Usher CD1 but if it's the same Usher that makes speakers it's well worth a listen.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Jingka99

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Post Number: 10
Registered: Aug-06
Edit Post

Peter, AZ, yes it's really well built and also had a chance to audition it and found the sound is good....Yes, it's from the same company that manufacture the Usher Speakers...the remote is quite compact and heavy too...

Problem is that I did not check whether it is autovolt (110-220) since here in Taiwan the source is 110-60hz...I check on it this weekend...

There's anothe one I saw which is also interesting, it's called Logic CD-50, the store said it's made in US but I also could not find much info on the net...it's well built as well as the Usher CD-1 and It uses BB PCM1737 24bit/192khz...

thanks...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 3537
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

"It uses BB PCM1737 24bit/192khz..."

This doesn't matter as much as you think. My Audio Refinement uses an 18 bit unit and sounds better in my opinion than the Rega Apollo. It's about the sum of the parts and not the parts.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Jingka99

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Post Number: 11
Registered: Aug-06
Edit Post

"Arnold, never heard of the Usher CD1 but if it's the same Usher that makes speakers it's well worth a listen."

problem is: they don't have NAD gear here in Taiwan, I was able to listen to Usher CD-1 with Usher amp, the sound was exceptional but I don't know whether it will match my NAD amp back home...Now I am confused, the offer price of Usher CD-1 here is a bit tempting, around $300...while the NAD C542 back home is around $490...and the C521BEE is more or less the same as the Usher CD-1...should I get the C521BEE over the Usher CD-1??? Need help here...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Jingka99

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Post Number: 12
Registered: Aug-06
Edit Post

Here's some links:

http://www.hiaudio.co.uk/UA/CD-1.htm

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&u=http://www.szaudio.com/ne wsfile/2006-8-15/200681516420319897.html&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=10&ct=result&p rev=/search%3Fq%3Dusher%2Bcd-1%26start%3D30%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Jingka99

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Post Number: 14
Registered: Aug-06
Edit Post

Just an update: I finally bought the NAD C542 and I am now enjoying my C352+C542 combi....

Thanks for everybody's advice...
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > CD Players > Archive through January 15, 2007 > Music Hall 25.2 vs NAD542 [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]