Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Archives - 2004 > Archive through May 10, 2004 > A/v receiver recommedation
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: A/v receiver recommedation
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous
 
Edit Post

I have the following setup polk rt800 cs400 rtfx surrounds kenwood 103sw sony str-de925 receiver. I am looking to upgrade my a/v receiver. Also want to add rear surrounds. Any suggestion on a receiver, budget in the $1000.00 range.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Elitefan1

Post Number: 382
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

I would recommend the Elite-vsx53 or the Marantz 7400. Both have excellent power supplies and the kind of sonics that match well with the Polk's. The H/K 630 is also worth a listen but is not quite as good a value as the other two IMO. If you can still find a hold over H/K 7200 that would be a great choice but the H/K are very shy on inputs. All will sound very nice with your Polk's which I like by the way. Good luck.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

curious
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

hey therealelitefan -
will the elite or the marantz drive both 4ohms and 8 ohms speakers (polks) ?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Landroval

Post Number: 104
Registered: Feb-04
Edit Post

Not so well. I dont know how low does the Polks drop, but if it's close to 2 ohms then the Marantz and Pioneer are not best choices. H/K will do a better job.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

curious
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

how about yahmaha?
how will that handle the ohms situation?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Elitefan1

Post Number: 384
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

Yamaha and Polk would be a bad combination sonically. I think the Elite 53 will drive a 4 ohm speaker as that's a standard of a THX receiver, it must pass a 3.2 ohm spec. This subject has been up for debate on this board but I will defer to the THX spokesman who answered this question in last month's issue of Home Theater.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

curious
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

thanks
i will be sure to look at the elite 53
any other suggestions for my polks?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Elitefan1

Post Number: 386
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

Just the usual suspects above. H/K and NAD and Marantz if they drive 4 ohm speakers. I know a dealer who sells Dynaudio speakers[4 0hm] with Marantz and tells me it's no problem but I don't know for sure. Which Polk's do you have?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

curious
Unregistered guest
Edit Post

i just bought (more like stealing, great deal) on a center speak-csi30 and a pair of rt35i.
again, i am now in search of a receiver that will match up well with these. i hate to go over a $1,000.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New member
Username: Dogles

Post Number: 1
Registered: Apr-04
Edit Post

What about denon 4303 or 4305? Why don't receiver mfr. list spec's for 4 ohms? Am I right in assuming that a reciever should be able to produce twice the wattage when driving 4 ohm speakers? these are the specs for Polk's RT series overall Frequency Response 30Hz - 26kHz
Lower -3dB Limit 45Hz
Upper -3dB Limit 25kHz
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms
Recommended Amplifier Power 20 - 150 w/channel
Efficiency 90 dB
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bronze Member
Username: Dmeister

Post Number: 100
Registered: Dec-03
Edit Post

Why don't receiver mfr. list spec's for 4 ohms?

Most manufacturers don't list specs for 4-ohm speakers because most of them don't design receivers to drive them. Most receivers do not employ power supplies that are robust enough to handle the high-current demands of 4-ohm speakers, particularly at higher volumes.

However, since there are relatively few 4-ohm speakers on the market, I doubt that companies specializing in mass-market products are really all that concerned about them.

Some receivers will "cheat" by allowing you to engage a current-limiting switch, which keeps the speaker from drawing too much current through the power supply.

Also, as far as the THX spec goes, keep in mind that a 4-ohm speaker would likely drop down to 2 or 3 ohms for the lower frequencies, since it is only nominally rated at 4 ohms.

Am I right in assuming that a reciever should be able to produce twice the wattage when driving 4 ohm speakers?

Yes, in theory, a perfect amplifier would double the output power at half the impedance. However, you are rarely if ever going to see this in a receiver, particularly for continuous power output.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Landroval

Post Number: 106
Registered: Feb-04
Edit Post

Here's some power measurements of AVRs with different loads. All numbers are 20ms burst power to five channels (per channel). 8/4/2 ohm:

H/K AVR325: 87 / 110 / 120 W
Pioneer AX3(=53): 115 / 175 / 72 W
Yamaha V1400: 130 / 120 / 54 W

As you can see H/K is the only one with no problems at 2 ohms. Though the Pioneer is the overall winner and will propably work fine with 4 ohm speakers.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Receivers > Archives - 2004 > Archive through May 10, 2004 > A/v receiver recommedation [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]