Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Subwoofers > Archive through April 04, 2006 > Energy S8.3 vs. B&W ASW300
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Energy S8.3 vs. B&W ASW300
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Twebbz

Ann Arbor, Michigan
USA

Post Number: 377
Registered: Apr-04
Edit Post

These two little subs are the same price ($350) and same configuration...forward firing 8 inch driver with a downward firing port. Which is a better bet?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 2946
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

I'm not sure about the Energy but I've had bad luck the B&W subs. I think you can do better with the Outlaw LFM2 (299.00).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Twebbz

Ann Arbor, Michigan
USA

Post Number: 378
Registered: Apr-04
Edit Post

Art...There is a concept that seems elusive to me. I think I want to roll off the the main speaker's bottom end where the sub's upper frequency picks up...at the setting of the sub's crossover control. In other words, I don't want the main speakers to produce the frequencies covered by the sub. I would be using the High Level sub speaker inputs. Tim at Alegria said his TOM sub would work this way, but it SEEMS that other subs don't.

I'm thinking that if the woofers of the mains aren't trying to reproduce those low frequencies then the upper bass/midrange would be clearer
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gold Member
Username: Artk

Albany, Oregon
USA

Post Number: 2948
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

I use a sub to fill at the point at which my speakers roll off at bottom. I don't artificially roll them off but instead have the sub fill in the 40 hz and below frequencies which my speakers don't produce. I'm not clear whether this is for a HT application or music. Your profile shows 2 channel gear.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Twebbz

Ann Arbor, Michigan
USA

Post Number: 379
Registered: Apr-04
Edit Post

Yea, just interested in music. I'd like the sub for the Energy C-3s with the Marantz receiver. The room is small, 10'x 11'. I think an 8" sub would be all I would need.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Gavincumm

New York
USA

Post Number: 876
Registered: Feb-05
Edit Post

yes it would...

a good 8 inch like the Onix X-series sub or the HSU research would be perfect in a room that size.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Silver Member
Username: Twebbz

Ann Arbor, Michigan
USA

Post Number: 380
Registered: Apr-04
Edit Post

Hmmmmm...That Onix-X looks interesting and I've looked at the HSU too. Any pros and/or cons comparing a front firing woofer to a downward firing woofer?
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Subwoofers > Archive through April 04, 2006 > Energy S8.3 vs. B&W ASW300 [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]