ARCAM CD73T VERSUS CAMBRIDGE 640C VERSION 2

Home > Message Board > Home Audio > CD Players > Archive through May 14, 2006 > ARCAM CD73T VERSUS CAMBRIDGE 640C VER...

Main Topics

Your Account

Help

Today's Posts | Last 3 Days

Author

Thread: ARCAM CD73T VERSUS CAMBRIDGE 640C VERSION 2

t h

New member

Username: Joe_perry

Post Number: 1
Registered: Jan-06

Posted on Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - 09:54 pm:

CAN ANYONE HELP ME COMPARE AND CONTRAST THESE 2 MODELS IN TERMS OF IMAGING AND SOUNDSTAGE AND MUSICALITY

I DONT HAVE MUCH OF A CHANCE TO AUDITION THESE 2 MODELS SIDE BY SIDE

I HAVE HEARD THE NEW REGA APOLLO AND LIKED IT VERY MUCH BUT IT SEEMED JUST A LITTLE SMOOTH (MAYBE THATS A GOOD THING) BUT I DONT THINK I CAN GO WITH A TOP LOADING CD PLAYER WITH MY CURRENT SET UP ALTHOUGH I MIGHT MAKE AN EXCEPTION

THANKS FOR ANY HELP OR REPLIES

Dech

Unregistered guest

Posted on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - 06:32 am:

I got CA 640C V2 one and sound are great details of Sound.I listen almost Jazz and Classic..I fall in Love this Machine since it was V1 then I go out to buy but there have the V2 for me and One thing I don't like is IT NOT READ CD-TEXT.
I had my Old Marantz CD6000 the base version it's already good for sound but when I compare to the CA V2.There aremore details and Treble are very clear and clean.I Cheer For CA.Prix and quality.

ca_convert

Silver Member

Username: Ca_convert

Cardiff
UK

Post Number: 191
Registered: Jan-05

Posted on Friday, January 27, 2006 - 06:36 pm:

If you HAD to choose with no audition possible and cost was no consideration then the Arcam is audibly better. I owned ther 640 for while, and auditioned the 73 before buying a NAD.....

Home > Message Board > Home Audio > CD Players > Archive through May 14, 2006 > ARCAM CD73T VERSUS CAMBRIDGE 640C VER...

[ « Previous ] [ Next » ]