| Author |
Thread: What receiver? |
   
Bronze Member Username: Hogwild
Post Number: 14 Registered: Aug-05
|
| Posted on Wednesday, October 26, 2005 - 12:55 pm: |
|
My home theatre (still months away) is nearing completion. What AV receiver should I buy? I know everyone has their own opinions - I want to hear them. In the $1000-1500 price range I've listened to Denon, Yamaha, Pioneer, Harmon Kardon. My home theatre will support 7.1 audio ($3000. worth of paradigm speakers), Video (Sony Cineza LCD projector) and gaming (both Xbox and online PC). How important is HDMI? What do you think of the Denon 3806?
|
|
|
|
   
New member Username: Zing
Post Number: 1 Registered: Oct-05
|
| Posted on Thursday, October 27, 2005 - 02:21 pm: |
|
Wait for the Yamaha RX-V2600. That thing will have everything including support for HDMI 1.2. It has upconversion, THX, XM radio and virtually every other feature you can thing of. Should be around $1300 to $1400 |
   
Silver Member Username: Cheapskate
Post Number: 482 Registered: Mar-04
|
| Posted on Friday, October 28, 2005 - 07:25 am: |
|
instead of spending that much on a reciever... look into panasonic SA-XR class-d recievers instead. mine totally spanks the crap out of my onkyo unit in every way... EVERY WAY. i've read rumors of people trading ther $1200 denons in for panasonics, and after making the switch, which was SUPPOSED to only be a stepping stone that would allow me to get the 4 ohm magnepans i wanted, but that sounded SO much better, that i'm happy as a clam with my NHT superzeros now. if you want HDMI, do give the SA-XR70 a try for a more than reasonable $300. you might be surprised at how good it sounds. it's pocket change for the budget you're proposing. i was amazed at how good my SA-XR55 sounds. it's fast, detailed and relaxed with liquid midrange and a HUGE soundstage. if you want harmon kardon... look into their class-d reciever. class-d amps kick major butt. they have the speed and detail of solid state with the imaging, warmth and ease of tube amps. with the money you save, you could get a behringer DEQ2496 stereo digital room correction unit to tune your main speakers to within +- 1dB which makes a huge improvement along with a monarchy DIP 2496 jitter reducer/upsampler to add a little more detail and ease to stereo digital (especially CDs). HDMI is very important for audio. coaxial digital will only pass 16/44 resolution even on most SACD and DVD-A players which will downsample their 24/96 and 1/192 data. HDMI will send 24/88 multichannel. HDMI is planning for the future too when high rez HD-DVD gets here. had i known that my panasonic would sound so darned awesome, i would have sprung the $50 more for HDMI SA-XR70 instead, but it was a stepping stone to biamplifying magnepan MMGs i was intending to get and would be recieving crossed over analogue signals. if you're using paradigms, then you're not going to be biamping. i really wish a respectable audio rag like "6 moons" (with many favorable reviews for class-d power amps) or "audioholics" would review a panasonic class-d and get the word out. i wouldn't hold my breath for "stereophile" to ever do it unless panasonic bough 100 pages worth of ads. that's for sure. i trust my panny enough to put it toe to toe against a $1500 A/B reciever any day. any differences would have to be minor. |
   
Terry54321 Unregistered guest |
| Posted on Saturday, October 29, 2005 - 04:37 pm: |
|
I have owned a Bob Carver Sunfire Ultimate Receiver for over a year now and really like it. The Ultimate produced much clearer sound than the equivalent priced top of the line Denon receiver when I did direct comparsions in two different show rooms using multiple brands of speakers. |
|