| Author |
Thread: C352 vs RA-03 |
    
|
| Posted on Wednesday, August 03, 2005 - 02:50 am: |
|
Anyone, please? Speakers would be Mordaunt-Short MS912.
TIA. |
|
|
|
Gold Member Username: Artk
Albany,
Oregon
USA
Post Number: 1405
Registered: Feb-05
|
| Posted on Wednesday, August 03, 2005 - 03:39 pm: |
|
If you have the opportunity to hear it for yourself that would be preferable. If given a choice I prefer the NAD for a number of reasons including the effortless power and very musical sound. Rotel is often more detailed in the upper midrange but the NAD just gets music right. |
Silver Member Username: T_bomb25
Dayton,
Ohio
United States
Post Number: 497
Registered: Jun-05
|
| Posted on Thursday, August 04, 2005 - 11:50 am: |
|
The Rotel is a little mechanical sounding,and can get fatiging to listen to. |
|
| Posted on Thursday, August 11, 2005 - 02:33 pm: |
|
New 352 owner here and very pleased. Paired with Monitor Audio S6 and NAD 542 CDP. For the money, it is a solid piece of equipment. I did not compare it to Rotel, but did compare to Arcam. Arcam was excellent and had a phono stage, but was a lot more money and I was not certain I could hear that big a difference.
|
Bronze Member Username: Ellison
Post Number: 25
Registered: Mar-05
|
| Posted on Friday, September 02, 2005 - 09:24 pm: |
|
How about Nad372? Will this be much hugely better than 352 and ra03? |
|
