Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Amps > Archive through April 28, 2005 > Difference between Cambridge Audio Az...
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Difference between Cambridge Audio Azur 340A and NAD C320BEE
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jelvis
Bronze Member
Username: James_the_god

Doncaster, South Yorkshire
England

Post Number: 91
Registered: Jan-05
Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 - 02:50 pm:    Edit Post
Whats the big differences between the two amps without suggesting I go to my local dealer to have a listen.
I am guessing the NAD gives a more 'bass like' sound all round.
Thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sun King
Silver Member
Username: Sun_king

Leeds, West Yorkshire
UK

Post Number: 179
Registered: Mar-04
Posted on Monday, March 28, 2005 - 08:06 pm:    Edit Post
Nad aren't famed for a particularly powerful bass, more a 'fast' well-timed bottom end. I've owned several of their amps and can confirm this. Both amps you mention are of the warm, British type and are very nice. In this instance the Nad is a better amp in my opinion and has better bass control. Neither has earth-shuddering bass though, you'll have to spend more money than the bottom of the range Nad if that's what you're after.
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Amps > Archive through April 28, 2005 > Difference between Cambridge Audio Az... [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]