Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Amps > Archive through March 20, 2005 > Arcam v nad integrated amps
Main Topics Main Topics   Your Account Your Account Search Search   Help/Instructions Help
Today's Posts Today's Posts | Last 3 Days Bookmark and Share
Author Thread: Arcam v nad integrated amps
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Curious George
New member
Username: Cgeorge

Santa cruz, Ca
Usa

Post Number: 3
Registered: Mar-05
Posted on Monday, March 07, 2005 - 04:29 am:    Edit Post
Anyone audition comparably priced NAD integrated amps versus Arcam ones? Eg., Arcam A65 versus NAD 352. Their reviews seem to live on different planets.

I go way back with NAD (3120, 3155...) but have loved my Arcam CD72, and thought their amps sounded nice while auditioning cd players. Anyone check out these things back to back? In either case they'd be driving a pair of bi-wired Spice TC-50s (ancient, but interestingly modified for crazy imaging).
Topics | Last Day | Search | Formatting Tips | Terms | Rules | Help | Log out | Bookmark and Share
Home > Message Board > Home Audio > Amps > Archive through March 20, 2005 > Arcam v nad integrated amps [ « Previous ] [ Next » ]