| Author |
Thread: Rotel RB-976 |
    
Silver Member Username: Rh1
Post Number: 151
Registered: Jun-04
|
| Posted on Thursday, September 23, 2004 - 04:03 pm: |
|
Is $350 too much for this amp in great condition, what about $275?? |
|
|
|
Silver Member Username: Rh1
Post Number: 152
Registered: Jun-04
|
| Posted on Thursday, September 23, 2004 - 04:27 pm: |
|
bump...
also, info on Acurus 100 x 3 amp....anybody with experience using this company's amps and if so is $300 a fair deal? |
|
| Posted on Thursday, September 23, 2004 - 04:51 pm: |
|
The Rotel cost $600 new, back in 1998 untill 2001.
I've read only rave reviews about this amp.
I think $300 is a good deal when its a 1998/1999 model (six years old) and in mint condition.
$350 for a 2001 model is an excellent buy.
Because its a great amp even $400 will be a nice deal (I think it's a shame that good products loose their value so quickly).
The Arcam I don't know. |
Silver Member Username: Rh1
Post Number: 153
Registered: Jun-04
|
| Posted on Thursday, September 23, 2004 - 05:04 pm: |
|
nout...thanks for the help on rotel!
any takers on the acurus?
side by side which of these would you suggest? |
|
| Posted on Thursday, September 23, 2004 - 05:54 pm: |
|
Acurus?(I didn't read properly, I read Arcam;)
You can read many favourable reviews on Audioreview.com about this amp, but you knew that already I guess. (use the search engine on this site and you'll find them easy)
The 100 x 3 was $950 new.
One consumer-reviewer paid $450 for a 2000 model on Ebay (I don't know when he purchased the amp, the review is from 2004)
$300 could definitely be a good buy. |
Silver Member Username: Rh1
Post Number: 154
Registered: Jun-04
|
| Posted on Friday, September 24, 2004 - 10:31 am: |
|
i have read the reviews and that is what led me to consider this. thanks for your help |
|
